From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-mailsplit: with maildirs try to process new/ if cur/ is empty Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:26:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20071105212624.GA9520@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20071026141539.29928.qmail@d3691352d65cf2.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20071026160118.GA5076@ferdyx.org> <20071105124920.17726.qmail@746e9cce42b49f.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Fernando J. Pereda" , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Gerrit Pape X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 05 22:26:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ip9T0-0003Xb-8x for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:26:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753551AbXKEV01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752403AbXKEV01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4724 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbXKEV01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 25301 invoked by uid 111); 5 Nov 2007 21:26:26 -0000 Received: from c-24-125-35-113.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (24.125.35.113) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:26:26 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:26:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071105124920.17726.qmail@746e9cce42b49f.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:49:20PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 06:01:18PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > By that reasoning, you should make it parse both cur/ and new/. > Okay. Isn't the subject line now wrong? -Peff