From: Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@flawedcode.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>,
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out.
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071105234147.GB12827@inspiron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85sl3kny8u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
On Mon 05 Nov 2007, 23:06, David Kastrup wrote:
> Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@flawedcode.org> writes:
> > On Mon 05 Nov 2007, 11:28, Steven Grimm wrote:
> >
> >> There is already precedent for that kind of mixed-mode UI:
> >>
> >> git checkout my-branch
> >> vs.
> >> git checkout my/source/file.c
> >
> > This is a different case: you're basically performing the same
> > operation, with the second line applying just to a subset of files.
>
> Huh? The first one moves HEAD. The second one doesn't.
That's why I wrote "basically". Anyway, the point is that this doesn't
seem to be a valid precedent.
- Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-05 19:01 [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-05 19:04 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-05 19:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-11-05 19:10 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-05 19:28 ` Steven Grimm
2007-11-05 19:50 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-05 21:54 ` Alejandro Martinez Ruiz
2007-11-05 22:06 ` David Kastrup
2007-11-05 23:41 ` Alejandro Martinez Ruiz [this message]
2007-11-05 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-05 23:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 0:08 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-06 2:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-06 3:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 4:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-06 8:49 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-06 9:29 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-06 9:37 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-06 12:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-06 18:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 19:39 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-06 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-06 22:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 20:06 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-06 20:13 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-06 21:21 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-06 22:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-07 8:16 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-07 11:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-07 19:32 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-07 20:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-07 9:03 ` David Kastrup
2007-11-06 11:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-06 11:51 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-11-06 12:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 12:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-06 12:48 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-06 17:43 ` Wincent Colaiuta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071105234147.GB12827@inspiron \
--to=alex@flawedcode.org \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=koreth@midwinter.com \
--cc=madcoder@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).