From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-mailsplit: with maildirs try to process new/ if cur/ is empty Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:51:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20071106075150.GA21694@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20071026141539.29928.qmail@d3691352d65cf2.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20071026160118.GA5076@ferdyx.org> <20071105124920.17726.qmail@746e9cce42b49f.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <20071105225258.GC4208@steel.home> <635FFEC2-2489-443B-8425-DF2B58BE23C2@mac.com> <20071106072831.GA3021@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Cohen , Gerrit Pape , "Fernando J. Pereda" , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 08:52:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpJEd-0005VD-NR for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:52:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754548AbXKFHwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:52:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754215AbXKFHwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:52:17 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4733 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752605AbXKFHwQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:52:16 -0500 Received: (qmail 28206 invoked by uid 111); 6 Nov 2007 07:52:11 -0000 Received: from c-24-125-35-113.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (24.125.35.113) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:52:11 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:51:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071106072831.GA3021@steel.home> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:28:31AM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote: > > In Maildir format, cur and new hold the mails. :P > > So? Why *STOP* reading the mails if just one of the directories could > not be opened? IOW, I suggest: Because you are then trying to apply a patch series with some patches potentially missing? Continuing only on errno == ENOENT seems prudent. -Peff