From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: git rebase --skip Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:16:01 +0100 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20071108191601.GA22353@glandium.org> References: <20071107222105.GA31666@glandium.org> <20071108032308.GA5638@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20071108102412.GA31187@atjola.homenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 08 20:18:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqCtB-0005uF-9q for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:18:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761119AbXKHTRn (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:17:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760966AbXKHTRn (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:17:43 -0500 Received: from vawad.err.no ([85.19.200.177]:60092 "EHLO vawad.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753971AbXKHTRm (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:17:42 -0500 Received: from aputeaux-153-1-36-161.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.124.128.161] helo=namakemono.glandium.org) by vawad.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IqCsa-00027q-LB; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:17:31 +0100 Received: from mh by namakemono.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IqCrB-0005r7-Uo; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:16:01 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-Spam-Status: (score 2.0): Status=No hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL version=3.1.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:43:05PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > git commit > > git rebase --skip > > I guess that works, and nothing else presently does. But I don't think > that's at all intuitive as the correct thing to do (plus it feels too easy > to get into losing your commit message). Maybe we should have a "git > rebase --amend", which does the obvious thing (acts like --continue, but > lets you edit the message). It's not like you just did something totally > different; the commit is still the replacement for D, it's just less the > same. Maybe some commands such as commit should fail or at least emit warning when used during a rebase ? Mike