From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: CJ van den Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] git-fetch: Limit automated tag following to only fetched objects Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20071109121228.GA4241@prefect.vdbonline.net> References: <20071109110631.GG19368@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 10 12:17:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqoLB-0007Pw-Px for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:17:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751411AbXKJLRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:17:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751334AbXKJLRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:17:15 -0500 Received: from marvin.vdbonline.net ([208.78.101.188]:50007 "EHLO marvin.vdbonline.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbXKJLRO (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:17:14 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1778 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:17:14 EST Received: from prefect.vdbonline.net (p54A754C0.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.84.192]) by marvin.vdbonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C0C6808F; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:47:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by prefect.vdbonline.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6BCE1A86A6; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:12:28 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071109110631.GG19368@spearce.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:06:31AM -0500, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > We now redefine the rule to be: "tags are fetched if they refer > to an object that was just transferred; that is an object that is > new to your repository". This rule is quite simple to understand, > you only get a tag if you just got the object it refers to. With this new rule a retrospectively pushed tag will never be fetched, right? With our local work flow tags are only ever pushed retrospectively because the tagged commit has to first pass regression tests. So this would be a major regression for us. I think adding a temporal dependency between the pushing and fetching of branches and tags in this way is likely to cause even more confusing and apparently random behaviour.=20 --=20 CJ van den Berg mailto:cj@vdbonline.com xmpp:cj@vdbonline.com --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHNE6sl3pZXfh0CHIRAh3jAKCVyEIgb4BD0GTEXpZDOa+Moj4H2gCdHP4M 9+MU0cP9hJE2IOpCD5nIKlI= =6WD1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--