From: Jing Xue <jingxue@digizenstudio.com>
To: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] RESUBMIT: replace reference to git-rm with git-reset in git-commit doc
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:43:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071112044300.GB7595@fawkes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vsl3c8afm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:27:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I think "changes ... can be removed" risks to give a confused
> mental model that somehow git tracks changes.
I see what you mean. "Changes" shouldn't be the subject here.
> "A file can be
> reverted back to that of the last commit with ..." would be
> less risky.
On top of that, I somehow still want to make it relevant to that
git-reset instead of git-rm should be used to revert git-add. So how
about this?
Signed-off-by: Jing Xue <jingxue@digizenstudio.com>
---
Documentation/git-add.txt | 1 +
Documentation/git-commit.txt | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-add.txt b/Documentation/git-add.txt
index 963e1ab..63829d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-add.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-add.txt
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ See Also
--------
gitlink:git-status[1]
gitlink:git-rm[1]
+gitlink:git-reset[1]
gitlink:git-mv[1]
gitlink:git-commit[1]
gitlink:git-update-index[1]
diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit.txt b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
index e54fb12..4b26cae 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-commit.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
@@ -154,11 +154,14 @@ EXAMPLES
--------
When recording your own work, the contents of modified files in
your working tree are temporarily stored to a staging area
-called the "index" with gitlink:git-add[1]. Removal
-of a file is staged with gitlink:git-rm[1]. After building the
-state to be committed incrementally with these commands, `git
-commit` (without any pathname parameter) is used to record what
-has been staged so far. This is the most basic form of the
+called the "index" with gitlink:git-add[1]. A file can be
+reverted back, only in the index but not in the working tree,
+to that of the last commit with `git-reset HEAD -- <file>`,
+which effectively reverts `git-add` and prevents this file from
+participating in the next commit. After building the state to
+be committed incrementally with these commands, `git commit`
+(without any pathname parameter) is used to record what has
+been staged so far. This is the most basic form of the
command. An example:
------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-02 2:17 git rm --cached Jing Xue
2007-11-02 16:13 ` Remi Vanicat
2007-11-02 21:41 ` Jing Xue
2007-11-03 9:39 ` Remi Vanicat
2007-11-04 17:04 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-11-11 14:05 ` Jan Hudec
2007-11-12 0:38 ` [PATCH] replace reference to git-rm with git-reset in git-commit doc Jing Xue
2007-11-12 2:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-12 4:43 ` Jing Xue [this message]
2007-11-14 8:56 ` [PATCH] RESUBMIT: " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071112044300.GB7595@fawkes \
--to=jingxue@digizenstudio.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).