From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Git in a Nutshell guide Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20071119222305.GE22293@fieldses.org> References: <1195477504.8093.15.camel@localhost> <8c5c35580711190845s71a4880ek4ab28170d277e0e6@mail.gmail.com> <8c5c35580711190904v5975e81k3d515dc44fee9c21@mail.gmail.com> <25CF3422-A236-46CE-B243-3F01117B7743@lrde.epita.fr> <60891A14-1D6E-4114-ACEF-4C981D326CFA@lrde.epita.fr> <0E0AA90A-2282-4AFE-8B94-EA0E35B57D65@lrde.epita.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthieu Moy , Lars Hjemli , Jonas Juselius , git@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Sigoure X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 19 23:23:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IuF1y-0006BR-Dy for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:23:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753381AbXKSWXX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752030AbXKSWXX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:23 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:49163 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753520AbXKSWXW (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:22 -0500 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IuF1F-0000W6-3r; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:23:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0E0AA90A-2282-4AFE-8B94-EA0E35B57D65@lrde.epita.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:51:35PM +0100, Benoit Sigoure wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Benoit Sigoure writes: >> >>> No please stop adding links from on man page to another. If you read >>> man git-reflog, you surely want to learn the HEAD@{N} syntax and see >>> practical uses cases. >> >> I don't understand your point. >> >> Yes, if I read man git-reflog, I do surely want to learn HEAD@{N} >> syntax, but that is _precisely_ what my patch does. > > By telling you to read another man page which is annoying and a recurring > complaint. Are we looking at the same patch? It both gives examples of the syntax *and* refers to another page. I thought it was the lack of the former, rather than the presence of the latter, that was the recurring complaint.... --b.