From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Addendum to "MaintNotes" Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20071122110910.GD10389@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <46dff0320711210511g7d9febf5k47b082cc13bb905a@mail.gmail.com> <7vhcjf9l1k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071122103600.GA10389@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vve7u5zoz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <85pry2ftee.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List , Ping Yin To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 22 12:09:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iv9w3-0003hX-J5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:09:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751506AbXKVLJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751053AbXKVLJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:13 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4145 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750696AbXKVLJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:13 -0500 Received: (qmail 22404 invoked by uid 111); 22 Nov 2007 11:09:11 -0000 Received: from c-24-125-35-113.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (24.125.35.113) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:11 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:09:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <85pry2ftee.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:48:09AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > > Now I've written this down, I can sleep well at night, knowing > > that I can safely be hit by a bus any day ;-) > > So regarding git development, a bus error will no longer imply a core > dump? I'm slightly ashamed to admit to laughing at that. -Peff