git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wishlist for a bundle-only transport mode
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:04:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711231104.32605.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vejehux3y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano :
>>> "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@gmail.com> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Sorry but I do not understand this. I think this two lines could be equivalent:
>>>>
>>>> git push --bundle bundle.bdl "refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/bundle/master"
>>>> git bundle create bundle.bdl refs/heads/master ^refs/remotes/bundle/master
>>> 
>>> Interesting.
>>> 
>>> 	$ git push $something ours:theirs
>>> 
>>> has defined semantics for any value of $something.
>>> ...
>>> If bundle.bdl does not exist yet, it is like pushing into a
>>> freshly initialized empty repository.
>>
>> But for that I think "git bundle" should learn new subcommand:
>> "git bundle update", which would use refs existing in given
>> bundle as prerequisites, and either update bundle (create anew
>> or just concatenate next pack) or create incremental bundle.
>>
>> Something similar to incremental mode or update command of
>> archivers...
> 
> I was disagreeing with Santi's "'push --bundle' and 'bundle
> create' can be equivalent".  They can't be, as "push" is always
> "update" and never "create".  So I do not quite get your "But for
> that I think"; I think you are just agreeing with me.

Bad choice of words on my part... and I didn't parse that you were
disagreeing as well as commenting. :-/

> Even if we taught "push" to create (which I doubt would happen
> due to its security and administrative implications), it would
> not make the two any closer to being equivalent.  For them to
> become equivalent, we would need to have "push" unlearn how to
> update, which would never happen ;-).

I also think that pushing to bundle might be not a good idea;
but I think that "git clone <bundle>" should just work.

Nevertheless I think that having "git bundle update" or 
"git bundle create --reference=<old bundle>" (or both) would be
a good thing, as it would free us from remembering or tagging when
last bundle was created.


Could anyone who uses "git bundle" actively raise a voice?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-23 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-21 14:54 Wishlist for a bundle-only transport mode Santi Béjar
2007-11-21 15:04 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-21 15:24   ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-21 15:46   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 16:52     ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-21 16:59       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 17:11         ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-21 17:26           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 17:52             ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-22  9:42             ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-22 10:02               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-23  9:18                 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-23  9:31                   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-23 10:04                     ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-11-23 10:13                     ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-23 12:18                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-23 15:06                       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-23 15:34                         ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-23 16:05                           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-23 16:39                             ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-24 19:15                               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-23 19:09                           ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-21 15:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 16:15   ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-21 16:36     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 16:44       ` Santi Béjar
2007-11-21 16:53     ` [PATCH] bundle create: keep symbolic refs' names instead of resolving them Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-22 12:03       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-22 12:24       ` [REPLACEMENT PATCH] " Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 16:23   ` Wishlist for a bundle-only transport mode Kristian Høgsberg
2007-11-21 17:07     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-21 17:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-11-21 17:29   ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711231104.32605.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=sbejar@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).