From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Hudec Subject: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20071126185600.GA25784@efreet.light.src> References: <200711252248.27904.jnareb@gmail.com> <2A34D324-48A4-49EF-9D4E-5B9469A0791D@lrde.epita.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Cc: Andy Parkins , git@vger.kernel.org To: Benoit Sigoure X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 26 19:56:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iwj8A-0007Sp-Cw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752993AbXKZS4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:56:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752408AbXKZS4L (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:56:11 -0500 Received: from ns1.bluetone.cz ([212.158.128.13]:36790 "EHLO ns1.bluetone.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751287AbXKZS4K (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:56:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (spamhole.bluetone.cz [192.168.13.2]) by ns1.bluetone.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F857EC23; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from ns1.bluetone.cz ([192.168.13.1]) by localhost (spamhole.bluetone.cz [192.168.13.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id dmSh30kc4p-F; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet.light.src (145-119-207-85.strcechy.adsl-llu.static.bluetone.cz [85.207.119.145]) by ns1.bluetone.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852E67EC32; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from bulb by efreet.light.src with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Iwj7g-0006mh-Hs; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:00 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2A34D324-48A4-49EF-9D4E-5B9469A0791D@lrde.epita.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 18:10:10 +0100, Benoit Sigoure wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Andy Parkins wrote: > While we're discussing bad names, as someone already pointed out, I agree= =20 > it's sad that "git push" is almost always understood as being the opposit= e=20 > of "git pull". Well, it is an oposite of pull. Compared to it, it is limited in that it wi= ll not do a merge and on the other hand extended to *also* be an oposite of fetch, but still oposite of pull is push. --=20 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHSxbARel1vVwhjGURArG7AKCNz36NX1P0NnwQTmLnzSf88pYnlwCg1Jxl B/ptz/4i+720xNGLEok3JBw= =ioYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--