From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:15:55 +0100 Message-ID: <200711270315.56849.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <200711252248.27904.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vd4twe9mn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071127015942.GM14735@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 03:16:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iwq0O-00051o-0t for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:16:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754188AbXK0CQI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:16:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753874AbXK0CQI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:16:08 -0500 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]:15235 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754800AbXK0CQF (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:16:05 -0500 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so1053557mue for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:16:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=i9BBD973z9rSLFVhOzbLRG+EtOmBgsgTnQyNcdzlMVM=; b=rN+LnZThn6S2rSfV5rc7Di9KDWfetaRUF1r9hD0WyIhV6kuVuH65ObRiSZqFg4UoWiD16hfnyXMgD+HVunOcH67pw29XxrVVgDTM8efwXtxBvcDXbjn/jSwnmaGjtB6bFruqgQwVGuttHzXY37eMHHSf3WBM7P9Rq5oTnPaYaRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=bd6WcPF3p2WSlUvuAeAIAljdtBW62AyErckBXnI7P5XdTm/sWUeCOVfLKecBSlmZNmXSNYsF+sVkM5HpHmVtlYZNPB72WX3K3inObx59DAd+qpX8BBtR3rqb/H0HKu4VKXZ0pJWXIwn5tFwDRGteyD8Tqw+ggXOKDrY/UExu7fg= Received: by 10.82.183.19 with SMTP id g19mr9120293buf.1196129763194; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.11? ( [83.8.221.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g8sm5304545muf.2007.11.26.18.16.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:16:02 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20071127015942.GM14735@spearce.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> ... not to mention countless others you would get wrong that you did not >> list in the above, as the current git got them right ;-) > > Indeed. > > Which is why nobody is looking to rewrite Git from scratch. > > Except myself and a few other nuts who want a pure Java > implementation for Eclipse plugins. :-) And the project to implement git in C# / Mono (I wonder what is the status of those implementations...) -- Jakub Narebski Poland