From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace misleading message during interactive rebasing Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20071127101520.GA5208@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1196111891-18518-1-git-send-email-win@wincent.com> <474BD5CA.7050407@viscovery.net> <20071127094639.GC3571@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 11:15:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IwxTp-0001Y0-7j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:15:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758423AbXK0KPZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758424AbXK0KPZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:25 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4036 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758320AbXK0KPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 31208 invoked by uid 111); 27 Nov 2007 10:15:21 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:21 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:15:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:49:03AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > If I remember correctly /bin/sh on Solaris cannot be used because > of other issues (like $(...) and such). BTW, your new mail/news gateway solution seems to send two messages. I got one that was addressed _only_ to me, and then this one came to the list (and was addressed only to the list). That means that I had to manually re-add the list when responding to the first one (or just assume that you responded to me off-list). Personally, I think this is worse than the previous "send only to the list" behavior because senders are inevitably going to fail to re-add the list (but then, I was never as bothered by others not to be cc'd in the first place). -Peff