From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20071130015315.GA13369@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071129231444.GA9616@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7veje8twt2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071130003512.GB11683@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071130010055.GB12224@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071130012536.GA12615@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Schindelin , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Jan Hudec , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 30 02:53:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ixv4T-0005G2-9A for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:53:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933072AbXK3BxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763761AbXK3BxS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:18 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2301 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762344AbXK3BxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:17 -0500 Received: (qmail 31164 invoked by uid 111); 30 Nov 2007 01:53:16 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:16 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:53:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:33:39PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > So what you want is for the dashed hardlinks to exist _inside_ the > libexec directory, even if most people won't "see" them due to that > libexec directory not being in the shell path, right? > > If that is what you mean then I personally don't care at all. That is exactly what I mean. -Peff