From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20071130151223.GB22095@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071129211409.GA16625@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20071129231444.GA9616@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7veje8twt2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071130003512.GB11683@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vzlwwsgkp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071130005852.GA12224@coredump.intra.peff.net> <5E2A9E2B-8B9A-46B0-99D0-DB3798F10119@zib.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Jan Hudec , git@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 30 16:12:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iy7Xp-0002il-Dj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:12:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760442AbXK3PM0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759951AbXK3PM0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:26 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:1628 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758089AbXK3PMZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:25 -0500 Received: (qmail 2861 invoked by uid 111); 30 Nov 2007 15:12:24 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:24 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:12:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5E2A9E2B-8B9A-46B0-99D0-DB3798F10119@zib.de> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:51:35AM +0100, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > What will happen to gitk? > > Shouldn't it be included in the nice collection? gitk is > an essential command. Then, following your reasoning, > "git " should recommend it, no? > > Note, "git gui" already works. gitk would really be the last > git "command" that can't be accessed through "git " Except for qgit, tig, etc. The only difference being that gitk actually ships with git. But I am not opposed to having some "git foo" form for gitk. -Peff