From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git-bisect feature suggestion: "git-bisect diff" Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:35:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20071207213541.GA11723@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071207093439.GA21896@elte.hu> <7v63za4yic.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwsrq3iox.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071207213414.GA11688@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 07 22:36:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0krj-0001m6-W4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:36:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756973AbXLGVfp (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:35:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756915AbXLGVfp (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:35:45 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3647 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756613AbXLGVfo (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:35:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 13357 invoked by uid 111); 7 Dec 2007 21:35:43 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:35:43 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:35:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071207213414.GA11688@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:34:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:25:34AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > git-bisect visualize: work in non-windowed environments better > > Isn't this more or less the use case for the "git view" alias? Which isn't to say that I don't think your solution is nicer; it is. But if we don't use it here, then perhaps "git view" really is a solution in search of a problem. -Peff