From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH 2/4] Use strbuf in http code Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:16:20 +0100 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20071211061620.GA8047@glandium.org> References: <7vy7c3ogu2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1197228659-19459-1-git-send-email-mh@glandium.org> <7vlk81him3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 11 07:17:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1yQN-0006jB-Ru for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:17:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751147AbXLKGQh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:16:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751266AbXLKGQh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:16:37 -0500 Received: from vuizook.err.no ([85.19.215.103]:43675 "EHLO vuizook.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984AbXLKGQh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:16:37 -0500 Received: from aputeaux-153-1-79-219.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr ([81.249.109.219] helo=namakemono.glandium.org) by vuizook.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1J1yQX-0001Rk-3e; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:17:15 +0100 Received: from mh by namakemono.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J1yPk-00029P-Mq; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:16:20 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vlk81him3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: (score 5.2): Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:04:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > struct buffer > > { > > - size_t posn; > > - size_t size; > > - void *buffer; > > + struct strbuf buf; > > + size_t posn; > > }; > > With this definition of "struct buffer", I do not think this can be correct. > > > @@ -1267,10 +1257,8 @@ static struct remote_lock *lock_remote(const char *path, long timeout) > > { > > struct active_request_slot *slot; > > struct slot_results results; > > - struct buffer out_buffer; > > - struct buffer in_buffer; > > - char *out_data; > > - char *in_data; > > + struct buffer out_buffer = { 0, STRBUF_INIT }; > > How seriously have you proofread and tested this series before sending > it out? Damn ! I did fix this on sunday and was pretty sure to have sent it :-/ Mike