From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: [PATCH] Brown paper bag fix to previous send-email change Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:28 +0100 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20071211074427.GA12959@glandium.org> References: <1197356116-12176-1-git-send-email-mh@glandium.org> <7v3au9hfuj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 11 08:44:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1znR-00073n-Sr for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750984AbXLKHoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:44:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751485AbXLKHoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:44:30 -0500 Received: from smtp28.orange.fr ([80.12.242.100]:2158 "EHLO smtp28.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbXLKHo3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:44:29 -0500 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2807.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B9D788000046 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from namakemono.glandium.org (APuteaux-153-1-79-219.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.249.109.219]) by mwinf2807.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9BA4080000BD; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:28 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20071211074428637.9BA4080000BD@mwinf2807.orange.fr Received: from mh by namakemono.glandium.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J1zn2-0003RV-66; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:28 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v3au9hfuj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:04:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > > My previous change led to the In-Reply-To header being <> when the given > > value was empty. This fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey > > --- > > > > I think I have an antispam problem somewhere with this patch, because even > > keeping sending it, it never reached the list. And Junio didn't answer to my > > private message about it, so I guess that was some server being smart with > > the subject line. *sigh* > > > > PS: sorry Junio if you get this patch multiple time. > > No, I happened to have noticed the same and have an almost identical fix > (I said "defined $initial_reply_to") already queued in my tree. Testing "defined $initial_reply_to" might not be enough, because $initial_reply_to can be defined and empty. Mike