From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git-cvsexportcommit fails for huge commits Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20071213090148.GA4496@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071211200418.GA13815@mkl-desktop> <20071212083154.GB7676@coredump.intra.peff.net> <46a038f90712121158n674a9044t75ef99473314457c@mail.gmail.com> <20071213041737.GA23624@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20071213083931.GA6441@mkl-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Langhoff , git@vger.kernel.org To: Markus Klinik X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 13 10:02:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J2jxS-0004bB-0V for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:02:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751685AbXLMJBy (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751446AbXLMJBy (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:54 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:4081 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751330AbXLMJBx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:53 -0500 Received: (qmail 8128 invoked by uid 111); 13 Dec 2007 09:01:50 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:50 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:01:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071213083931.GA6441@mkl-desktop> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Markus Klinik wrote: > > it would be nice to get feedback from Markus on what platform he is > > using and what is a reasonable value), or just using a tempfile with > > xargs, which should figure out the correct value. > > My platform is an ubuntu 7.04. In that case, I think a very large value like 100K is fine. Then the code won't activate unless it is really required. It still feels a bit hack-ish and wrong, but I'm not sure what would be better. -Peff