From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-svn: handle our top-level path is deleted and later re-added Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:43:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20071214164328.GA5213@hand.yhbt.net> References: <475C8748.6000005@cryos.net> <20071210104235.GA7521@xp.machine.xx> <20071213164134.GD18433@soma> <20071213181312.GA4441@xp.machine.xx> <20071214163909.GA18300@soma> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Baumann , "Marcus D. Hanwell" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 14 17:43:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J3Ddg-00020j-2R for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:43:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753752AbXLNQna (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:43:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752813AbXLNQna (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:43:30 -0500 Received: from hand.yhbt.net ([66.150.188.102]:60296 "EHLO hand.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752528AbXLNQn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:43:29 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hand.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C667DC025; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:43:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071214163909.GA18300@soma> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Subject: [PATCH] git-svn: handle our top-level path is deleted and later re-added That should read: Subject: [PATCH] git-svn: handle our top-level path being deleted and later re-added > --- > Peter Baumann wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:41:34AM -0800, Eric Wong wrote: > > > Instead of handling the full delete of everything in r68, I think I'll > > > make it so importing r75 will clobber all the stuff in trunk/ we ignored > > > deleting in r68 before adding the contents of trunk/ in r75. > > > > > > > Sorry, that last sentence I can't parse/understand. But I trust you to do the > > right thing. > > I hope the commit message was a better explanation. Or the code > and test case I've added makes perfect sense :) My language generation module seems broken these days. -- Eric Wong