From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] provide advance warning of some future pack default changes Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:30:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20071217213049.GG13515@fieldses.org> References: <20071214215206.GB7300@mail.oracle.com> <20071214223957.GC7300@mail.oracle.com> <20071215004230.GF7300@mail.oracle.com> <20071217200920.GB19816@mail.oracle.com> <20071217211317.GC19816@mail.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Jakub Narebski , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Joel Becker X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 17 22:32:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4NZG-0003Ac-GU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:32:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936219AbXLQVbZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:31:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936199AbXLQVbZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:31:25 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:34645 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936190AbXLQVbX (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:31:23 -0500 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J4NY7-0007xI-2H; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:30:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071217211317.GC19816@mail.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:13:18PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote: > Sure, we're not complaining about that. We complain some about > the fast pace (at the time he had his problem, 1.4 installs were not > unusual, and Junio's response suggested that "I use NFS" wasn't strongly > considered as a use case), but more we complain about the obscurity of > the reason. If it's obvious what happened (not the specifics, just > "please upgrade" or "repository format changed" or something), the user > moves along. By the way, just as a data point: I do keep some git repositories on NFS, and access them from multiple machines with different git versions (not on purpose--it's just that the machines don't all run the same distro, so it'd be extra work to give them all the same version). I don't use anything older than 1.5.0. If the repository became unusable on one of those machines without warning it'd be annoying. ---b.