From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] provide advance warning of some future pack default changes Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20071218124808.GA3728@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20071217200920.GB19816@mail.oracle.com> <7v3au16myj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq8o4yxc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <46a038f90712171952i4f53876fv55b0e6993d5f4b0a@mail.gmail.com> <7vlk7s38aq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071218111136.GA6266@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Martin Langhoff , Nicolas Pitre , Joel Becker , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 18 13:48:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J4bsB-0001A0-B5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:48:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754815AbXLRMsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754795AbXLRMsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:12 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3652 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753535AbXLRMsL (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:11 -0500 Received: (qmail 19311 invoked by uid 111); 18 Dec 2007 12:48:10 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:10 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:06:23PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > - option parsing tweaks (hopefully these should be minor, but it is > > clear that we cannot be 100% consistent while retaining the > > identical previous behavior) > > IMHO this does not warrant a version bump. It should be mostly > behind-the-scenes, after all. Yes, it should be, but I think there will be a few user-visible fallouts (like "--abbrev $foo" in scripts should now be "--abbrev-default $foo" for safety). -Peff