From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
To: Git ML <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [FIXED PATCH] git-describe: Add a --match option to limit considered tags.
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:02:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071222180244.GD23262@artemis.madism.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221214954.GA16481@artemis.madism.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1057 bytes --]
Like I said on IRC, I saw that git describe --contains has a bad
behaviour:
$ git describe --match='asd*' HEAD; echo $?
fatal: cannot describe 'e272415ab7da3bde51af2ce95c88d7be3abfba28'
128
$ git describe --contains HEAD; echo $?
undefined
0
THe "undefined" output is on stdout (not stderr), and returns 0.
The issue here is that it internally uses git-name-rev by exec-ing it, which
makes it hard to fix. Though I suppose that we could instead of fork-ing
share some logic with builtin-name-rev.c, but I'm not at home yet, so
won't likely have a patch for this issue.
Note that the use of the "new" --match here was just to be unable to
describe the HEAD to show the difference, the inconsistency has nothing
to do with the patch I propose, I just happen to noticed that.
AFAICT it's not a regression, it's just a misfeature :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-22 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-21 16:18 [PATCH] git-describe: Add a --match option to limit considered tags Pierre Habouzit
2007-12-21 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-12-21 21:22 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-12-21 21:49 ` [FIXED PATCH] " Pierre Habouzit
2007-12-22 18:02 ` Pierre Habouzit [this message]
2007-12-24 11:18 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-12-24 15:57 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071222180244.GD23262@artemis.madism.org \
--to=madcoder@debian.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).