From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH 5/6] Refresh the main stg man page Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:30:08 +0200 Organization: RFC 1149 (see http://www.rfc1149.net/) Message-ID: <2008-10-06-23-30-08+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> References: <20081005155450.19886.43748.stgit@yoghurt> <20081005160157.19886.7137.stgit@yoghurt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Karl_Hasselstr=F6m?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Catalin Marinas" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 06 23:31:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kmxfv-0003FN-7c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:31:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753216AbYJFVaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:30:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752964AbYJFVaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:30:21 -0400 Received: from zaphod.rfc1149.net ([88.191.14.223]:52950 "EHLO mail.rfc1149.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545AbYJFVaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:30:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rfc1149.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52117E050B; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc1149.net Received: from mail.rfc1149.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zaphod.rfc1149.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJ2zHxidGM0h; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail2.rfc1149.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:1382:f950::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail2.rfc1149.net", Issuer "rfc1149.net" (verified OK)) by mail.rfc1149.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC2BE283F; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.rfc1149.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACE4C40BC; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail2.rfc1149.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPJW4Va9bQGZ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail2.rfc1149.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D017C40BD; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 23:30:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Catalin Marinas's message of "Mon\, 6 Oct 2008 22\:14\:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-WWW: http://www.rfc1149.net/sam X-Jabber: (see http://www.jabber.org/) X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 79C0 AE3C CEA8 F17B 0EF1 45A5 F133 2241 1B80 ADE6 (see http://www.gnupg.org/) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Catalin" == Catalin Marinas writes: Catalin> I wouldn't advertise the refreshing of "any" patch as it Catalin> doesn't always work (it actually fails in a lot of cases). Or Catalin> at least we could mention that there are some restrictions. Does it? I use it all the times. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/