From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] git stash: one bug and one feature request Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20080104210408.GA26248@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <477E6D26.9020809@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pascal Obry , Brandon Casey , Marco Costalba , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 04 22:04:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JAtie-000415-TU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:04:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753560AbYADVEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753551AbYADVEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:12 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3865 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753076AbYADVEL (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:04:11 -0500 Received: (qmail 19518 invoked by uid 111); 4 Jan 2008 21:04:09 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:04:09 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:04:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:51:05AM -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote: > or "git stash delete" > > This probably would require the command to delete single reflog, > which was posted some time ago and is in either pu or in offcuts, > or in next. > > But I guess this is post 1.5.4 There is a "git reflog delete" in next (but not in master). See 552cecc2. Using the same name makes sense, since they are equivalent actions (and "git stash delete" should be very easy, since it is implemented in terms of reflogs). -Peff