From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20080111222126.GA30184@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <7EAB1DA8-627D-455E-AA23-C404FDC615D9@zib.de> <930EC77A-73D1-4DDD-81D4-BF22B248FCB6@zib.de> <14E7B5D5-B1B8-4532-A471-106B14B912B8@zib.de> <20080111195022.GC29189@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 11 23:21:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDSG5-0001CS-Ut for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761265AbYAKWVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761082AbYAKWVW (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:21:22 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:60438 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761110AbYAKWVV (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:21:21 -0500 Received: from ravnborg.org (0x535d98d8.vgnxx8.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [83.93.152.216]) by pasmtpB.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932A5E30D9C; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by ravnborg.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 188AE580D2; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:26 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:18:49PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:16:02AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > (Every place I've ever been at, people who had a choice would never > > > ever develop under Windows, so I've never seen any real mixing - even > > > when some parts of the project were DOS/Windows stuff, there was a > > > clear boundary between the stuff that was actually done under Windows) > > > > The reality I see is the other way around as common practice. > > Not in my world. > > I see a few people who are stuck to Windows, but they are so because they > are lazy. They do not ever do something interesting with computers in > their free time, and while working, they only do what they are told to do. Some of the people I have in my mind I will certainly not call lazy, but the other part of the description is a fine match. > That might sound cynical, but you will have to _show_ me different > examples to make me reconsider. I just wanted to say that things looks different in some places of the world nad for some types of development. I do not even know what I should try to make you reconsider - as I did not follow the full thread. Just stumbled over this statement. Sam