git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git apply behaves differently from patch(1)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:58:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801162358.48723.zander@kde.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1396 bytes --]

In the following usecase git apply (git version 1.5.4.rc3.15.g785f9) 
doesn't do what I expect it should do. I expect it to do the same as 
patch does in the same situation.

To reproduce;
Create a file 'test' with a number on each line.  Numbers 1 though 10.
$ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do echo $i >> test; done
$ git add test
$ git commit test

$ rm test
$ for i in 1 3 4 5 6 7 10; do echo $i >> test; done
$ git diff-index -p --unified=0 HEAD test | tee mypatch

Now use your editor to edit 'mypatch' and remove the first hunk; the end 
result (after your editing) should be something like this;
$ cat mypatch
diff --git a/test b/test
index f00c965..319869c 100644
--- a/test
+++ b/test
@@ -8,2 +6,0 @@
-8
-9

apply revert this patch;
$ git apply -R --unidiff-zero --apply mypatch
$ git diff

What I expect (and what I get if I replace git apply with a 'patch -R -p1 
< mypatch') is that the diff shows line "2" is still missing.

What I get instead is that "2" is missing but also that "10" moved 2 lines 
up.
I conclude that git somehow doesn't like the patch to be removed, while 
patch(1) has no problem with that.

I hope you agree its a bug and fix it in an upcoming version, it would be 
great if I can avoid using patch(1) or worse.
If you have any questions feel free to ask; but please cc me as I am not 
subscribed.
-- 
Thomas Zander

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-16 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-16 22:58 Thomas Zander [this message]
2008-01-17  8:11 ` git apply behaves differently from patch(1) Johannes Sixt
2008-01-17 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200801162358.48723.zander@kde.org \
    --to=zander@kde.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).