From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Bailey Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix random fast-import errors when compiled with NO_MMAP Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:45:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20080118094553.GB22052@hashpling.org> References: <20080118032222.GX24004@spearce.org> <20080118035700.GA3458@spearce.org> <20080118092652.GA22052@hashpling.org> <7v8x2nh3uw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , Linus Torvalds To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 18 10:46:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFno8-00017o-Pe for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:46:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753237AbYARJqL (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:46:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753278AbYARJqK (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:46:10 -0500 Received: from pih-relay08.plus.net ([212.159.14.134]:34334 "EHLO pih-relay08.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237AbYARJqJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:46:09 -0500 Received: from [212.159.69.125] (helo=hashpling.plus.com) by pih-relay08.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JFnnR-00045s-BG; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:45:57 +0000 Received: from fermat.hashpling.org (fermat.hashpling.org [127.0.0.1]) by hashpling.plus.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0I9jrod000768; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:45:53 GMT Received: (from charles@localhost) by fermat.hashpling.org (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id m0I9jrJH000767; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:45:53 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v8x2nh3uw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:36:55AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Well, I do not want to be picky with these things, but you do > not own that area, so that would be "Tested-by:" > > I've already committed the simplified version I suggested to > Shawn. > Sorry, I thought that Acked-by was an acceptable tag for people not involved in the development path of a patch. I don't want to add a "Tested-by" as I am not a fast-import user and I am *only* reporting the success of the test suite, not any real-world testing. Charles.