From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-revert is a memory hog
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:59:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128055933.GA13521@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080127172748.GD2558@does.not.exist>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:27:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> <-- snip -->
>
> $ git-revert d19fbe8a7
> Auto-merged drivers/input/input.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/input/input.c
> Auto-merged include/linux/input.h
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/linux/input.h
> Automatic revert failed. After resolving the conflicts,
> mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' and commit the result.
> $
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> In top you can see that this took > 800 MB of RAM !
I tried to reproduce this, but my peak heap allocation was only around
20MB. Is your repository fully packed? Not packed at all? Can you use
valgrind/massif to figure out where the memory is going?
> I don't know how easy it would be to implement, but shouldn't git-revert
> be able to be as fast and less memory consuming as
> git-show d19fbe8a7 | patch -p1 -R
In your case, the patch doesn't apply cleanly, so we end up doing a
3-way merge (in my tests, it is git-merge-recursive which ends up taking
up the memory).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 17:27 git-revert is a memory hog Adrian Bunk
2008-01-27 17:38 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-01-28 6:01 ` Jeff King
2008-01-28 5:59 ` Jeff King [this message]
2008-01-29 21:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-29 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-29 22:20 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 22:30 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-29 22:45 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 22:51 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 22:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-29 22:54 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 22:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-29 22:57 ` Jeff King
2008-01-29 23:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-29 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-30 4:40 ` [PATCH] Optimize rename detection for a huge diff Junio C Hamano
2008-01-30 6:57 ` Luke Lu
2008-01-30 7:24 ` Luke Lu
2008-02-13 9:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-13 10:19 ` David Kastrup
2008-02-13 10:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-14 3:00 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080128055933.GA13521@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).