From: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [StGit PATCH 1/2] Add test to ensure that "stg clean" preserves conflicting patches
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:11:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080129031014.1095.78501.stgit@yoghurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080129030752.1095.27968.stgit@yoghurt>
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
If "stg push" fails, the subsequent "stg clean" will remove the patch
that could not be applied. I think it's wrong. Especially when doing
"stg pull", it can happen that I want to run "stg clean" to get rid of
the patches applied upstream so I can concentrate on the conflict.
Instead, the conflicting patch is removed too.
The test added by this patch should pass once the bug is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
---
I doctored the commit message a bit, and made the failing test use
test_expect_failure.
t/t2500-clean.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t2500-clean.sh b/t/t2500-clean.sh
index 3364c18..b38d868 100755
--- a/t/t2500-clean.sh
+++ b/t/t2500-clean.sh
@@ -24,4 +24,21 @@ test_expect_success 'Clean empty patches' '
[ "$(echo $(stg unapplied))" = "" ]
'
+test_expect_success 'Create a conflict' '
+ stg new p1 -m p1 &&
+ echo bar > foo.txt &&
+ stg refresh &&
+ stg pop &&
+ stg new p2 -m p2
+ echo quux > foo.txt &&
+ stg refresh &&
+ ! stg push
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'Make sure conflicting patches are preserved' '
+ stg clean &&
+ [ "$(echo $(stg applied))" = "p0 p2 p1" ] &&
+ [ "$(echo $(stg unapplied))" = "" ]
+'
+
test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-29 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-29 2:58 kha/safe and kha/experimental updated Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:02 ` [StGit PATCH 0/5] Various cleanups Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:02 ` [StGit PATCH 1/5] Create index and worktree objects just once Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:03 ` [StGit PATCH 2/5] Wrap excessively long line Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:03 ` [StGit PATCH 3/5] Eliminate temp variable that's used just once Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:04 ` [StGit PATCH 4/5] Simplify editor selection logic Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 20:09 ` Peter Oberndorfer
2008-01-30 7:28 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-01-30 14:55 ` Jay Soffian
2008-01-30 17:57 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:06 ` [StGit PATCH 5/5] Let the caller supply the diff text to diffstat() Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:10 ` [StGit PATCH 0/2] "stg clean" test+bugfix Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:11 ` Karl Hasselström [this message]
2008-01-29 3:12 ` [StGit PATCH 2/2] Don't clean away patches with conflicts Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:15 ` [StGit PATCH 0/4] Rewrite "stg edit" to use new infrastructure Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:15 ` [StGit PATCH 1/4] Teach new infrastructure about the default author and committer Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:15 ` [StGit PATCH 2/4] Teach new infrastructure to apply patches Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:16 ` [StGit PATCH 3/4] Teach new infrastructure to diff two trees Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 14:40 ` David Kågedal
2008-01-29 15:57 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-01-29 3:17 ` [StGit PATCH 4/4] Convert "stg edit" to the new infrastructure Karl Hasselström
2008-02-01 7:49 ` [StGit PATCH 0/3] "stg edit" fixups Karl Hasselström
2008-02-01 7:50 ` [StGit PATCH 1/3] Parse the date instead of treating it as an opaque string Karl Hasselström
2008-02-01 7:50 ` [StGit PATCH 2/3] Convert "stg edit" to the new infrastructure Karl Hasselström
2008-02-01 7:50 ` [StGit PATCH 3/3] It's possible to edit unapplied patches now Karl Hasselström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080129031014.1095.78501.stgit@yoghurt \
--to=kha@treskal.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).