From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix doc typos Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:43:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20080130204357.GC4475@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <87myqoxvzk.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4t0ONBuCiVxn5iiM" Cc: git list To: Jim Meyering X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 30 21:44:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKJnd-0004B3-02 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:44:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752231AbYA3UoM (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:44:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752148AbYA3UoM (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:44:12 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:60898 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752066AbYA3UoL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:44:11 -0500 Received: from frugalware.elte.hu ([157.181.177.34] helo=genesis.frugalware.org) by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim) id 1JKJms-0005Ur-IM from ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:44:09 +0100 Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1FAAE1190525; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:43:57 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87myqoxvzk.fsf@rho.meyering.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 _SUMMARY_ Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --4t0ONBuCiVxn5iiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:38:55PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Here is an illustration, by Jon Loeliger. Both node B and C are > -a commit parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered > +commit parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered wouldn't this be "Both commit node B and C are parents of commit node A."? - VMiklos --4t0ONBuCiVxn5iiM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHoOGNe81tAgORUJYRAlxQAJ0WAjG1dGQEF8odJTygbvkPcYB/NgCeNm50 ccFVZtMcR6TFAyb2qYs4nm4= =bnjo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4t0ONBuCiVxn5iiM--