From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:56:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20080203125651.GA18392@mit.edu> References: <7vmyqk563z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <87k5lnwvzd.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <878x22j1km.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <20080203103804.GC323@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Pierre Habouzit , Junichi Uekawa , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 03 14:41:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JLf6Y-0003Pd-8w for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 14:41:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754837AbYBCNlW (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:41:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755919AbYBCNlW (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:41:22 -0500 Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:48166 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754447AbYBCNlV (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:41:21 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2641 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 08:41:21 EST Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by thunker.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1JLePt-0003wY-MQ; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:57:49 -0500 Received: from tytso by closure.thunk.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JLeP2-0005ND-R1; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:56:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080203103804.GC323@artemis.madism.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:38:04AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > http://www.google.com/trends?q=svn%2C+git%2C+mercurial%2C+bzr%2C+darcs&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 > > :) Unfortunately the only problem with this trend chart is that if you take the baseline of git and mercurial starting in the time period between April 2004 and 2005 (i.e., before development of those two systems started), git's and mercurial's usage hasn't actually grown by that much. The problem being of course that git and mercurial are words that can be used in other contexts, which is somewhat less likely with svn and bzr, which makes it harder to draw good conclusions. - Ted