From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hommey Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:50:24 +0100 Organization: glandium.org Message-ID: <20080208225024.GA26975@glandium.org> References: <200802081828.43849.kendy@suse.cz> <20080208220356.GA22064@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 08 23:50:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNc3F-00022U-Iy for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:50:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753161AbYBHWt4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:49:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754156AbYBHWt4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:49:56 -0500 Received: from vuizook.err.no ([85.19.215.103]:50328 "EHLO vuizook.err.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752353AbYBHWtz (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:49:55 -0500 Received: from aputeaux-153-1-42-109.w82-124.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.124.6.109] helo=jigen) by vuizook.err.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNc3T-00009u-VO; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:50:54 +0100 Received: from mh by jigen with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JNc36-00072q-Uy; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:50:24 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: A479 A824 265C B2A5 FC54 8D1E DE4B DA2C 54FD 2A58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Spam-Status: (score 2.2): No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:34:55PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Also note that the http transport uses info/http-alternates for http:// > > urls. By the way, it doesn't make much sense that only http-fetch uses > > it. > > I think it does make sense: nobody else needs http-alternates. If you're setting an http-alternate, it means objects are missing in the repo. If they are missing in the repo and are not in alternates, how can any other command needing objects out there work on the repo ? Mike