From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Harl Subject: Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:11:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20080211221157.GF20741@albany.tokkee.org> References: <20080210035611.GA2454@atjola.homenet> <20080211084704.GB20741@albany.tokkee.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rtWt6SZ6GqpxALBD" Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink , Git Users List To: Sam Granieri Jr X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 11 23:12:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOgt5-0002yV-0m for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:12:31 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758473AbYBKWMA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:12:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757830AbYBKWL7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:11:59 -0500 Received: from mail.tokkee.org ([212.114.247.92]:39591 "EHLO albany.tokkee.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757861AbYBKWL6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:11:58 -0500 Received: by albany.tokkee.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE0F8364001; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:11:57 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --rtWt6SZ6GqpxALBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sam, On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:55:37AM -0600, Sam Granieri Jr wrote: > If a person wants to work on a tag branch, would the right idea be to =20 > create new branch on it as to not screw up the previous tag? Why would you want to do that? A tag is supposed to be something immutable. The only reason for having such a "tag branch" in the first place is that this seems to be the best representation of what SVN is doing and there's no better way (yet?) to convert it to something more Git-like... Cheers, Sebastian --=20 Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin --rtWt6SZ6GqpxALBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHsMgtEFEKc4UBx/wRArN+AJ9nk+ziGMqsWCeJBMHfRm2hA0I0JQCfWkfZ sdNs/pQf2CGCHjstNF0MJXw= =/mJD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rtWt6SZ6GqpxALBD--