From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC] sending errors to stdout under $PAGER Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20080217181523.GA4818@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7vbq6g90gy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080217144854.56fcb98d.froese@gmx.de> <7vd4qv1n78.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Edgar Toernig , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 17 19:16:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQo3a-0007bx-Mn for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:16:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753439AbYBQSP2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753438AbYBQSP1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:27 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2549 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753314AbYBQSPZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:25 -0500 Received: (qmail 3093 invoked by uid 111); 17 Feb 2008 18:15:24 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:24 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vd4qv1n78.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:56:27AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better/safer to redirect stderr to the pager > > in the first place? > > > > So, instead of the current > > > > foo | less > > use > > foo 2>&1 | less > > I like it. Much nicer. Thanks. This will also put the stderr of any sub-programs into the pager, which is probably worse if you have, e.g., a chatty external diff program. I don't know if we care enough about that. -Peff