From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Minor annoyance with git push Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:17:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20080220181756.GB16289@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7v7ihd7ee1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080210101756.GB26568@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080210122321.GA31009@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vzltwavf9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080220140306.GA6928@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vk5kz7btw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080220181513.GA16289@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Steffen Prohaska , Martin Langhoff , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 20 19:18:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRtWf-0000I1-KH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:18:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755034AbYBTSSA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:18:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754154AbYBTSSA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:18:00 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2824 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751511AbYBTSR7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:17:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 7407 invoked by uid 111); 20 Feb 2008 18:17:58 -0000 Received: from lawn-128-61-31-98.lawn.gatech.edu (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (128.61.31.98) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:17:58 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:17:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080220181513.GA16289@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:14PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > > Yeah, we are on the same page. See the patch I sent out last night ;-) > > Meaning you will take this patch? (And yes, I think the "+HEAD" patch > you sent is a good fix, regardless of everything else we've talked > about). Nevermind this question if you are going to take Daniel's patch to move the ref resolution to the lower layer. -Peff