From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Onno Kortmann Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH] Allow renaming of the top-most branch by just calling stg rename Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:30:56 +0100 Message-ID: <200802212230.56646.onno@gmx.net> References: <200802172203.55533.onno@gmx.net> <20080218140005.GA18668@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Karl =?iso-8859-1?q?Hasselstr=F6m?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 21 22:31:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSJ0y-0004La-0j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:31:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751099AbYBUVbA (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:31:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751288AbYBUVbA (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:31:00 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43431 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751056AbYBUVa7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:30:59 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2008 21:30:57 -0000 Received: from 14-235-dsl.kielnet.net (EHLO noodle.okhome) [89.27.235.14] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2008 22:30:57 +0100 X-Authenticated: #482760 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+QtmUWZJuQWrahuJzM7Z5alJ488JV/hmzT+yIJYj ADi5AgzAuAIR6n User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20080218140005.GA18668@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, > > instead of stg rename . This is for example helpful for > > those people who always have a typo or two in their patch names. > > Please follow the commit message conventions. That is, first one short > summary line, then a blank line and the rest of the commit message. > And a sign-off. Ok, I tried to do this, I'm not used at all to sending patches with (st)git :-) Thanks for the pointer and the assistance. Hopefully, --refid works as I understand it and the new patches appear in this thread. > Please consider storing the patch names in two suitably named > variables, like this: I fixed that one, too. I'll send out another patch, a test case for the stg rename command. Greetings, Onno