From: Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Minor annoyance with git push
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:35:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080221223549.GA26266@dervierte> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802201535250.17164@racer.site>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:38:31PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> That depends awfully on your definition of "safe".
>
> I, for one, hate the idea already, that I am "safe" when "git push" does
> not do the thing I asked it to, and which it has done for a couple of
> years now without complaint, and which I have gotten used to.
>
> And then, there will be a great confusion for me, since I work on 5
> different machines on an average day, with 5 different git versions, and
> having different config settings.
Which is worse: pushing more refs than you intended (requiring rewinding
refs on a repository that other people may pull from), or pushing fewer
refs than you intended, requiring you to run the command a second time?
--
-Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com>
Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4
B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-08 4:44 Minor annoyance with git push Martin Langhoff
2008-02-08 4:50 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-02-08 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-09 11:22 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-02-10 3:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 12:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-08 11:52 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-08 22:23 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-02-08 22:27 ` Mike Hommey
2008-02-08 5:38 ` Sean
2008-02-08 6:29 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-02-08 11:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-08 22:27 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-02-08 22:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-09 2:46 ` Jeff King
2008-02-09 2:54 ` Jeff King
2008-02-09 13:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-09 13:22 ` Jeff King
2008-02-09 11:22 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-02-09 3:00 ` Jeff King
2008-02-09 3:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-09 3:55 ` Jeff King
2008-02-09 11:50 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-02-09 13:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 10:13 ` Jeff King
2008-02-10 12:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-17 1:08 ` [RFC] checkout to notice forks (Re: Minor annoyance with git push) Junio C Hamano
2008-02-17 3:31 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-17 4:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-17 6:39 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-17 7:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-17 17:36 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-17 12:28 ` Jeff King
2008-02-20 16:01 ` Santi Béjar
2008-02-19 17:03 ` Martin Langhoff
2008-02-20 23:05 ` [PATCH] checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messages Junio C Hamano
2008-02-21 1:45 ` Jeff King
2008-02-21 3:42 ` [PATCH] checkout: updates to tracking report Junio C Hamano
2008-02-21 5:27 ` Jay Soffian
2008-02-21 17:02 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-02-21 2:56 ` [PATCH] checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messages Jay Soffian
2008-02-09 10:53 ` Minor annoyance with git push Steffen Prohaska
2008-02-09 13:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 2:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 2:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 10:17 ` Jeff King
2008-02-10 12:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 12:23 ` Jeff King
2008-02-10 13:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 13:07 ` Jeff King
2008-02-20 8:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-20 13:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-20 15:20 ` Jay Soffian
2008-02-20 15:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-21 22:35 ` Steven Walter [this message]
2008-02-22 0:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-20 14:03 ` Jeff King
2008-02-20 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-20 18:15 ` Jeff King
2008-02-20 18:17 ` Jeff King
2008-02-20 18:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-20 18:23 ` Jeff King
2008-02-10 14:03 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2008-02-10 15:02 ` Steven Walter
2008-02-10 16:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 16:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-10 18:18 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2008-02-10 22:34 ` Jeff King
2008-02-10 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-10 23:29 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080221223549.GA26266@dervierte \
--to=stevenrwalter@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).