From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Walter Subject: Re: Minor annoyance with git push Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:35:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20080221223549.GA26266@dervierte> References: <7v7ihd7ee1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080210101756.GB26568@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080210122321.GA31009@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vzltwavf9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <76718490802200720w4dd89dc1lf7b19d546d3bfd00@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 21 23:36:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSK1x-0003y3-H4 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:36:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765222AbYBUWgI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:36:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757142AbYBUWgH (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:36:07 -0500 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.176]:39942 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757202AbYBUWgF (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:36:05 -0500 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so206897ika.5 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:36:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8qPC9l7eY1LNiyK7oKrqZ41CPLFjhc6UAdlRqRokbck=; b=LbM8fzCei/0sPrLGmd/Ap8O/Tibxvvr0RY+smocYMHgpScsoF1+hqQJF6jlcDy7MaCZPr0Xh00RJiNNH7NUgibtouQzyrXtLMn3LN/ThCbX0n6GIljwwVnTQKeTY2u7mr64FQ3iajgY5+w6SIbpFErMj5seEzvXM1OKdCZ9WUYs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=nbjTKKRnTdqIicak0MNd0P7DEYyb8Y0XmsvXb/xVtgqm3AVDe230tww7Zzppb/S3bKfeMy7RdvCI+RGbfNr+NiLHk5t0haD1zKCe+F68apm7I87P2WRs12ZK9xQgdTShMEnlxW5qeRsS6sh0cKY5HvC1mbLBu/JmKqdDabTtnW0= Received: by 10.142.187.2 with SMTP id k2mr5627255wff.25.1203633352979; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from dasbrennen.isa-geek.org ( [76.177.39.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l22sm943503wrl.38.2008.02.21.14.35.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by dasbrennen.isa-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D74D234D3; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:35:49 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:38:31PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > That depends awfully on your definition of "safe". > > I, for one, hate the idea already, that I am "safe" when "git push" does > not do the thing I asked it to, and which it has done for a couple of > years now without complaint, and which I have gotten used to. > > And then, there will be a great confusion for me, since I work on 5 > different machines on an average day, with 5 different git versions, and > having different config settings. Which is worse: pushing more refs than you intended (requiring rewinding refs on a repository that other people may pull from), or pushing fewer refs than you intended, requiring you to run the command a second time? -- -Steven Walter Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4 B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F