From: mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at (Martin Koegler)
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] builtin-fsck: reports missing parent commits
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:16:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080225071642.GA15761@auto.tuwien.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vlk59pwaj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:08:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
> As far as I can tell, the new test is not testing the commit
> object we are looking at from the object database. What it is
> testing is if the code that parsed and prepared the information
> in "struct commit" found the same number of parents an extra
> check we are doing here by hand (if not grafted --- but
> presumably whoever gave the struct commit we are handling here
> would have obtained that information by doing the same parsing),
> or the parsing of the graft file (when grafted --- but
> presumably whoever gave the struct commit we are handling here
> would have obtained that information by calling the same
> llokup_commit_graft()).
>
> So I am not sure what problems in the repository objects these
> new checks are designed to catch.
>
> This needs a lot of explanation than what's in your commit log
> message.
If we have already parsed a non-commit object and parse_commit_buffer
hits such a sha1 in a parent line, it simply drops it (same for grafts).
I hope that you agree with me, that fsck should catch such an error.
As you don't want to tighten parse_commit_buffer, it must be in fsck.
mfg Martin Kögler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-24 20:58 [PATCH v3] builtin-fsck: reports missing parent commits Martin Koegler
2008-02-25 3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-25 7:16 ` Martin Koegler [this message]
2008-02-25 7:24 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080225071642.GA15761@auto.tuwien.ac.at \
--to=mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).