From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: git-email automatic --to detection? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:55:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20080225205505.GY31441@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20080225183413.GA15131@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jnCIwN96y15MEy/K" Cc: Jeff King , John Goerzen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 25 21:55:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTkMU-0001rs-CK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:55:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751676AbYBYUzJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:55:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753093AbYBYUzI (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:55:08 -0500 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:10773 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751556AbYBYUzH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:55:07 -0500 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9771B2524; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:55:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEA544668; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:52:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 178E211901F5; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:55:05 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --jnCIwN96y15MEy/K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:57:13PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > The really nice thing with the way darcs does it is that it makes it > extremely easy for an occasional contribution. If the maintainer > configured his stuff correctly, it's really "darcs get; ... ; darcs > record; darcs send". git-send-email is nice, but harder to use for a > first-timer. that's true, while the practice can be the opposite. darcs forces you to have an smtpd on localhost, while git allows you to send the patch from your mail client. this _is_ easier for people sometimes. (especially these days when everybody blocks dhcp address ranges and an avarage user doesn't configure a proxy smtpd on localhost usually i think.) - VMiklos --jnCIwN96y15MEy/K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHwyspe81tAgORUJYRAj8+AKCDxFJvmEunje42WKPj0LuZqXPC7ACfcbvq Mwo//8amvj7wehzAkP0rEvQ= =LmI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jnCIwN96y15MEy/K--