From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: git-email automatic --to detection? Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20080226174442.GM31441@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20080225183413.GA15131@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080225205505.GY31441@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i1KFSYFbl/HTybMx" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: John Goerzen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 26 18:46:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU3sx-0008Vl-Eq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:46:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763968AbYBZRou (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:44:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763369AbYBZRot (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:44:49 -0500 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:13286 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763978AbYBZRos (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:44:48 -0500 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B10F1B253C; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:44:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F18844668; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:42:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3D631190217; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:44:42 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --i1KFSYFbl/HTybMx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:59:55AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Actually, both can do both, right? right. afaik no commands read the remote git config atm, but it might be possible. > darcs send -o will write the data > to send out to a file on disk, and git-send-email will transmit the > message. true. what annoyed me is that i needed net access to generate the file, ie i was not able to do a 'darcs send -o file', copy the file to an usb stick and send it from some other box. > I don't so much care about the default as making it easy for > people that do have a local sendmail or smtpd or (ugh) MAPI client to > send patches automatically, if I tell them what flags to use. but that's the case for git as well :) you should tell people (for example): use "git format-patch origin"; send the created *.patch files and use "git pull --rebase" to avoid an unnecessary merge. - VMiklos --i1KFSYFbl/HTybMx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHxFAKe81tAgORUJYRAoGAAJwIGMy7NTYJ5R55nyPz4I16ZqDHQgCfcIws rbOhOrPp6SbiWSyjfoZaReM= =icn1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i1KFSYFbl/HTybMx--