From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] t6024-recursive-merge.sh: hide spurious output when not running verbosely Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20080229235442.GA20028@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1204323805-23185-1-git-send-email-mh@glandium.org> <20080229225331.GA8440@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080229225816.GA24892@glandium.org> <7vfxvbbbhn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Mike Hommey , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 01 00:55:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVF4U-0001dO-AC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:55:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932103AbYB2Xyq (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758964AbYB2Xyq (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:46 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3832 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760658AbYB2Xyp (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:45 -0500 Received: (qmail 13001 invoked by uid 111); 29 Feb 2008 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:44 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:54:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vfxvbbbhn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:15:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > test_expect_success 'refuse to merge binary files' ' > >> > printf "\0" > binary-file && > >> > git add binary-file && > >> > >> Should this perhaps just be: > >> > >> test_expect_success 'reset state' 'git reset --hard' > > > > Is it really about testing git reset ? > > No, it is about setting the stage to perform the test in > question, so it belongs inside. That sounds reasonable to me. -Peff