git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t6024-recursive-merge.sh: hide spurious output when not running verbosely
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:10:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080301041005.GA8969@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v1w6vb9w4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:50:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Actually, I think this might be a bit more sensible approach.
> 
> -- >8 --
> tests: allow optional clean-up phrase to expect_success/failure
> 
> When one test modifies the state of the test repository that the later
> tests may depend on, you may want to add a clean-up action that is run
> regardless of the outcome of the main part of the test.
> 
> This can now be specified as the third parameter to test_expect_success
> and test_expect_failure functions.

I think your heart is in the right place with this patch, but I doubt
that it is going to be all that productive in practice. Most tests
consist of a long list of commands, and cleaning up properly after every
possible failure case is going to be a lot of work. And worse, since the
tests generally _don't_ fail, you have no way to test that your cleanup
is reasonable.

So I think we will end up in the case where a few failed tests will
properly clean themselves up and let further tests proceed, but most
failures will leave a big question. In other words, what problem have we
solved?  If tests N and N+k both fail, would you, even with this patch,
suspect N+k of actually failing, or would you first go and debug test N?
Is that any different than what you do now?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-01  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-29 22:23 [PATCH] t6024-recursive-merge.sh: hide spurious output when not running verbosely Mike Hommey
2008-02-29 22:53 ` Jeff King
2008-02-29 22:58   ` Mike Hommey
2008-02-29 23:01     ` Jeff King
2008-02-29 23:15     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-29 23:54       ` Jeff King
2008-02-29 23:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-29 23:50   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-01  4:10     ` Jeff King [this message]
2008-03-01  4:27       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-03-01  4:28         ` Jeff King
2008-03-01  5:40           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080301041005.GA8969@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mh@glandium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).