From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Will git have a baseline feature or something alike? Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 13:39:43 +0100 Message-ID: <200803011339.50978.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <47C8FFFC.3050901@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric miao , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sam Vilain X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 01 13:40:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVR13-0005fy-OJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:40:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751759AbYCAMkA (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:40:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751369AbYCAMkA (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:40:00 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:38507 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbYCAMj7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:39:59 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so835413ugc.16 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:39:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=dobj0gys2TsaVWEX0uYSmNY0/ZS3o/TkinE9j/zPCpI=; b=eFVR2RTHPFvAlcrEWlrk5j65Yl/1c1Fue7YlogdIgN8BgaJyP63p1u/JFRWC2PrXCLPveL7lNRoYPtmYVlEpMqZkwRdOZ6CojlH1XcB/pU1a+++Lo7fbJRHazTLD/uv/py8/1UwG143a7txZ5RfKD24IiJjn4ZpVjpQ0DK/IS3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ep4AB4FIX+eqJuXO0YaHjxVNXljro+gjSp+S5RYgwpCcZChm4hFY6MrycNPFtI7O8AboBERa8frZLYYVRzNc+qZKBlwOBmwFCQDJOahGrzmGUYrwnDPQUlffqpKIryjs2jTqPw/ypQt6TqMay5J/kKA7siWObUQolbHbf0cKB1U= Received: by 10.67.89.15 with SMTP id r15mr2962502ugl.12.1204375197880; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.15? ( [83.8.199.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b35sm3349059ugd.33.2008.03.01.04.39.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:39:56 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <47C8FFFC.3050901@vilain.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Sam Vilain wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> BTW. the largest git repository is 1.6G OpenOffice.org conversion, >> with > 2G checkout, and some large binary files under version >> control. Mozilla and GCC, other large repos, got under 0.5G IIRC. >> So kernel should be quite smaller. > > I have an 8GB git-svn import of the KDE repository :-) First, how large full checkout is? And how large Subversion repo? Second, is this repository tightly packed (large window, big delta chain)? And last, KDE repos should most probably be split into submodules. -- Jakub Narebski Poland