From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Buchacher Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: cause a conflict if file mode does not match Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:07:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20080314100747.GA23145@localhost> References: <20080308171726.GA16129@localhost> <20080313125229.GA24758@localhost> <20080313192246.GA30361@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 14 11:08:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ja6qD-0004bh-C3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:08:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752057AbYCNKH5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:07:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752053AbYCNKH5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:07:57 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.190]:50785 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752001AbYCNKH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:07:56 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so9463882mue.5 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:07:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; bh=VfGbritxZFYStAZTrYzT+tw7QKVnrkgIzaskauMwDuM=; b=HmR5b0HRE4AMdgo+0GKFUnx7DlcXPo/oiu3pK73qrFgTVEyi99efZ9+zJjCTuoPxiwXSF45KtzleUF7X2dgDmBk3LJKh6yICPvaHT7hwCxba2qly22dGx6USiCWDHS3ut8K2pt02sGI/QDCfH2hOjMJmpQVr1K6vKNU0jU0rsOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=qfW0FoSVoWNw8o4mJI918Y7Ym6xeiaeqP5OA+zH/1zOKDwAkKmnYul5WpbZaDPyXZQrIJ1KEf3FWCDVtaLU5sSa01zFviPI2fgOnLIigu6MwQCHVUVyxQ5UgLzZAKF+bQCPvSJuBFtVZ5VbGzGxlFk1Z/XVB4ytHiK3Fmfmfqeo= Received: by 10.78.193.5 with SMTP id q5mr4337583huf.75.1205489273239; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from darc.dyndns.org ( [88.117.115.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z40sm8166959ikz.4.2008.03.14.03.07.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from drizzd by darc.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja6pH-000635-AI; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:07:47 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Your patch certainly fixes a bug in git-merge-file. It does not fix the > > bug in git-merge-recursive, however. The test script also fails with > > your patch. > > Now, _that_ is funny. I tested before sending, and my test suit runs just > fine. I didn't mean the existing test suite, which is fine with your bugfix, of course. I was talking about the test which I submitted along with my bugfix. Regards, Clemens