From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Simpkins Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add new git-graph command Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20080330220037.GA10978@adamsimpkins.net> References: <20080330195840.GA8695@adamsimpkins.net> Reply-To: Adam Simpkins Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 31 00:01:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jg5ad-0003GZ-Gc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:01:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754447AbYC3WAl (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:00:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754448AbYC3WAl (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:00:41 -0400 Received: from smtp182.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.182]:60579 "EHLO smtp182.iad.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754382AbYC3WAl (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:00:41 -0400 Received: from relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BB20D1B51A9; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: simpkins-AT-adamsimpkins.net) with ESMTP id 83F9E1B5118; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sleipnir.adamsimpkins.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F02114100B8; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Adam Simpkins writes: > > > This is a first pass at a command to print a text-based graph of the commit > > history. It is similar to the history graph shown by gitk, but doesn't > > require a windowing system. > > Should I understand that git-show-branch has too cryptic an output? Yes, I find it a bit hard to read with more than just a few branches. -- Adam Simpkins adam@adamsimpkins.net