From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Auto detaching head options (update) (Re: Working copy revision and push pain) Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20080331020920.GA412@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <47E6765D.2020103@jwatt.org> <20080325192552.GC4857@efreet.light.src> <20080325232424.GB5273@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7v3aqde2wn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080329082757.GA4920@efreet.light.src> <20080329084743.GA19200@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vy77zslor.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080331015937.GA32645@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jan Hudec , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Watt , Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 31 04:10:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jg9TK-0001Zr-14 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:10:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753581AbYCaCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753703AbYCaCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:23 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2129 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753041AbYCaCJX (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:23 -0400 Received: (qmail 10812 invoked by uid 111); 31 Mar 2008 02:09:22 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:22 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:09:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080331015937.GA32645@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:59:37PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Why is 605fac8 beneficial? What common workflow is updating the HEAD > branch through its actual name? If it is manipulating the index and Apparently my reading skills are not what they used to be. In the comment from 605fac8, it specifically mentions pushing directly into a branch that is the same as HEAD. But that is one of the cases that we Jan is trying to improve, so I don't see a problem with reverting in favor of his proposal. -Peff