From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
To: "A B" <gentosaker@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git bisect on multiple cores
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:47:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804090747.23596.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804090629.29122.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Le mercredi 9 avril 2008, Christian Couder a écrit :
> Le mardi 8 avril 2008, A B a écrit :
> > git bisect is really cool. I use it for the first time.
> > Just a thought, if you have a multiple core computer, can't you make
> > git build new versions in the background while testing the previuos
> > version? Alright, if you build 2 versions, one of them will never be
> > tested, but you will perhaps save some time by letting it build in the
> > background?
>
> Yes, you can do that.
>
> If you have cloned your repository twice (or more), then you can bisect
> compile and test at the same time in your 3 repositories (or more if you
> really want).
>
> For example if bisecting in one repo asks you to test revision X, then
> you can bisect and then build (and even maybe start testing) in another
> repo assuming revision X is good, and in yet in another one assuming
> revision X is bad.
>
> (In the repo where you assume X is good you use:
>
> "git bisect start CURRENT-BAD X"
>
> and in the third one, where you assume X is bad, you use:
>
> "git bisect start X CURRENT-GOOD")
In fact, you have to give all the good revisions you have, not just the last
one. So it should be
"git bisect start CURRENT-BAD X GOOD1 GOOD2 ..."
or
"git bisect start X GOOD1 GOOD2 ..."
instead of the above.
> When you know that X was good then you can kill the build or test
> processes and "git bisect reset" in the repository where you assumed
> wrongly X was bad. You can then assume something else with "git bisect
> start B G" and build and test in this repo again.
Above also you must give all the good ones, so it is:
"git bisect start B G1 G2..."
> In the repo that told you X was good, then you need only to use "git
> bisect good" or "git bisect bad" without building and testing to assume
> something about the revision that should be built and tested.
Regards,
Christian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 10:58 git bisect on multiple cores A B
2008-04-08 12:50 ` David Symonds
2008-04-08 18:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-09 4:29 ` Christian Couder
2008-04-09 5:47 ` Christian Couder [this message]
2008-04-09 7:17 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-04-09 8:07 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-04-09 8:27 ` Karl Hasselström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804090747.23596.chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--to=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=gentosaker@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox