From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Friendly refspecs Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20080410080325.GA15791@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20080409101428.GA2637@elte.hu> <20080409145758.GB20874@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080409200836.GA19248@mithlond> <20080409203453.GA10370@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080409222500.GB19248@mithlond> <20080409225112.GB12103@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080410000349.GA16800@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080410001152.GB16800@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vlk3mxi4z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Teemu Likonen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 10 10:04:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjrlY-00027U-9F for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:04:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754275AbYDJIDb (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752960AbYDJIDa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:30 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3184 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbYDJID3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:29 -0400 Received: (qmail 22642 invoked by uid 111); 10 Apr 2008 08:03:26 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:26 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:03:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vlk3mxi4z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:51:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thanks for bringing this issue up and proposing a pair of improvements. > > I am very inclined to apply [1/2] to maint. I am not convinced if [2/2] > is a good idea in general but if it is silent on pull and verbose on > one-off fetch without local store, it probably is an improvement. I think that is the right behavior for 2/2; I was just being a little lazy earlier. I will try to work up an improved 2/2, but I will probably be out of touch for a few days. Maybe we will see some comments from the list in the meantime. -Peff