From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080414.034116.24468363.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080414010412.c42dc560.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414.013058.149905948.davem@davemloft.net> <20080414031530.2507660d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, w@1wt.eu, david@lang.hm, sclark46@earthlink.net, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, rjw@sisk.pl, tilman@imap.cc, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, lkml@rtr.ca, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 14 12:42:06 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlM8R-0004wq-JF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:42:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755771AbYDNKlR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:41:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755631AbYDNKlR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:41:17 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53885 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755051AbYDNKlP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:41:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunset.davemloft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FBAC8CA9E; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:41:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080414031530.2507660d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: From: Andrew Morton Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:15:30 -0700 > You carefully deleted my text so that you could misquote it, thereby > flagrantly misrepresenting everything I said. Not the intention, but anyways: > Here it is again: > > : The steps to be taken are: > : > : a) agree that we have a problem > : > : b) agree that we need to address it > : > : c) identify the day-to-day work practices which will help address it (as > : you have done) > : > : d) identify the process changes which will force us to adopt those practices > : > : e) implement those process changes. > > Forcing a discipline upon oneself is totally different from having it > forced upon you by someone else. > > Each step will need general agreement and buyin, otherwise none of it will > (or should) work. The "force" is to "us" which is a group. And I imagine that newcomers will be expected to adopt these "practices". So in effect, they will be "forced" into the process changes as well. I'm getting more and more sensitive to issues on this level over time, because I realize that the fundamental issue in all human group issues is getting people to "want" to do things. And "force", in any form, tends to be incompatible with "want". And in particular, people will often even shun things they "want" when it is "forced" to them.